Right now, what we'd really love is for you to view all of your scripts in 3.5.2-b2 (even if it means manually installing it elsewhere) and tell us if anything is wrongly colored. We're looking for:
- Code (purple etc) wrongly colored as body text (black)
- Body text (black) wrongly colored as code (purple etc)
- False positives for syntax errors (yellow background)
As I noted, we're coloring using a secondary engine, so there may well be some mistakes and/or cases that we've overlooked.
I did as you suggested and installed to a different location, and I've spent several hours going over most of the scripts in my personality.
First, I'd like to say what great addition this syntax colouring is! I really like it. I will have to change the colours though, when that feature becomes available, because I'm a bit colour-blind, so I do have some difficulty with the dark purple and black (of course that may also be down to my screen

). With that in mind, I do have a couple of things I'd like to mention.
Sometimes the variable in a {set <var> to <data>} is light grey, other times it's very dark purple/black (or it looks like it to me). What's the reason for this? I couldn't immediately see a pattern to it, so I'm just curious. I'm also thinking that I can't really see a difference between the black and purple. To me, the dark shades are too close for me to distinguish between. At least, that's what I'm guessing, it could also be that the purple/black are being coloured wrong, and I'm just not able to see the difference.
The yellow error highlight is great. It helped me see a couple more mistakes that I had missed when going through all the scripts. One thing I noticed with this was with the missing colons from the System report script that you recently fixed. Obviously my edited version didn't have this fix in place, but I was a little confused when the yellow highlight was on the { of the next line after the missing colon. When I first saw this I thought something was wrong with that line, then I read the change log and realised what it was trying to tell me. Shouldn't it have highlighted the end of the line where the colon was missing? Is this something that can be done?
The only gripe I have, that I can think of, is that I can't right-click to do a copy/paste in the new editing engine. I have to use the icons at the top, or keyboard shortcuts instead. Is this something that can be added?
Overall, considering this is the first implementation, I am very impressed. Well done guys!
o7
DC